Date: April 24-25 , 2024
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
We are excited to be a part of GLI Regulators Roundtable 2024!
We encourage you to dive into a two-day journey filled with motivational speakers, compelling panel debates, and dynamic talks addressing the critical challenges that regulators encounter in the constantly evolving worldwide gaming sector.
This event will provide you with the tools not only to better yourself but also your business.
Secure your spot and meet our experts Melissa Aarskaug, VP Gaming, and Senior VP, Information Security Services, Gus Fritschie below, who will be attending this exciting event!
Moderator: Melissa Aarskaug, Vice President - Bulletproof
As the gaming landscape continues to evolve, so do the challenges and opportunities associated with regulatory compliance and cybersecurity. This session explores the intricate and delicate relationship that must exist between regulation and cybersecurity. Regulatory and cybersecurity experts will present the critical importance of establishing robust regulatory frameworks while also implementing effective cybersecurity measures to safeguard security and sustainability. The panel will also examine strategies and best practices for navigating the cybersecurity landscape, including the complexities, challenges, and opportunities regarding collaboration between gaming companies and regulators, promoting education and awareness of cybersecurity risks.
Moderator: Gus Fritschie - Vice President, Security Services, Bulletproof
The latest update of GLI-27 Network Security Best Practices dates back to 2013, rendering it obsolete and lacking in current technologies. Consequently, its relevance has significantly diminished. Within the gaming industry, GLI holds a pivotal role in establishing widely accepted best practices and guidelines that are often adopted by regulatory bodies. Notably, GLI-19 B and GLI-33 B serve as prominent examples where security requirements were widely embraced. However, despite their superiority over GLI-27, these documents also require enhancements. They drive gaming organizations to conduct comprehensive security assessments, yet some operators and testing vendors have exploited the flexibility within the standards, leading to less rigorous testing and weaker implementations.